Senate · 118th Congress, session 2 · roll call 132 · April 17, 2024
On the Point of Order (Is the Schumer Constitutional Point of Order Against Article I Well Taken)
Is the Schumer Constitutional Point of Order Against Article I Well Taken
51-48
Point of Order Well Taken
0crossed party lines
12news score
D 47–0 · R 0–48 · I 4–0
Why this vote scores 12:
- decided by 1 vote (51-48)
Every member's vote
✓ Yes (51)
Kelly (D-AZ)Sinema (I-AZ)Butler (D-CA)Padilla (D-CA)Bennet (D-CO)Hickenlooper (D-CO)Blumenthal (D-CT)Murphy (D-CT)Carper (D-DE)Coons (D-DE)Ossoff (D-GA)Warnock (D-GA)Hirono (D-HI)Schatz (D-HI)Duckworth (D-IL)Durbin (D-IL)Markey (D-MA)Warren (D-MA)Cardin (D-MD)Van Hollen (D-MD)King (I-ME)Peters (D-MI)Stabenow (D-MI)Klobuchar (D-MN)Smith (D-MN)Tester (D-MT)Hassan (D-NH)Shaheen (D-NH)Booker (D-NJ)Menendez (D-NJ)Heinrich (D-NM)Luján (D-NM)Cortez Masto (D-NV)Rosen (D-NV)Gillibrand (D-NY)Schumer (D-NY)Brown (D-OH)Merkley (D-OR)Wyden (D-OR)Casey (D-PA)Fetterman (D-PA)Reed (D-RI)Whitehouse (D-RI)Kaine (D-VA)Warner (D-VA)Sanders (I-VT)Welch (D-VT)Cantwell (D-WA)Murray (D-WA)Baldwin (D-WI)Manchin (I-WV)
✕ No (48)
Sullivan (R-AK)Britt (R-AL)Tuberville (R-AL)Boozman (R-AR)Cotton (R-AR)Rubio (R-FL)Scott (R-FL)Ernst (R-IA)Grassley (R-IA)Crapo (R-ID)Risch (R-ID)Braun (R-IN)Young (R-IN)Marshall (R-KS)Moran (R-KS)McConnell (R-KY)Paul (R-KY)Cassidy (R-LA)Kennedy (R-LA)Collins (R-ME)Hawley (R-MO)Schmitt (R-MO)Hyde-Smith (R-MS)Wicker (R-MS)Daines (R-MT)Budd (R-NC)Tillis (R-NC)Cramer (R-ND)Hoeven (R-ND)Fischer (R-NE)Ricketts (R-NE)Vance (R-OH)Lankford (R-OK)Mullin (R-OK)Graham (R-SC)Scott (R-SC)Rounds (R-SD)Thune (R-SD)Blackburn (R-TN)Hagerty (R-TN)Cornyn (R-TX)Cruz (R-TX)Lee (R-UT)Romney (R-UT)Johnson (R-WI)Capito (R-WV)Barrasso (R-WY)Lummis (R-WY)
◐ Present (1)
Source: official record